McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Clinician Article

Aspirin vs. clopidogrel monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: 1-year follow-up of the STOPDAPT-3 trial.



  • Watanabe H
  • Natsuaki M
  • Morimoto T
  • Yamamoto K
  • Obayashi Y
  • Nishikawa R, et al.
Eur Heart J. 2024 Dec 16;45(47):5042-5054. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae617. (Original)
PMID: 39215959
Read abstract Read full text
Disciplines
  • Cardiology
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • Internal Medicine
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • Hemostasis and Thrombosis
    Relevance - 5/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There was no previous trial comparing aspirin monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy following short dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents.

METHODS: In the STOPDAPT-3, patients with acute coronary syndrome or high bleeding risk (HBR) were randomly assigned to either 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and prasugrel followed by aspirin monotherapy (aspirin group) or 1-month prasugrel monotherapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (clopidogrel group). This secondary analysis compared aspirin monotherapy with clopidogrel monotherapy by the 30-day landmark analysis. The co-primary endpoints were the cardiovascular endpoint defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischaemic stroke and the bleeding endpoint defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5.

RESULTS: Of the 6002 assigned patients, 5833 patients (aspirin group: N = 2920 and clopidogrel group: N = 2913) were included in the 30-day landmark analysis. Median age was 73 (interquartile range 64-80) years, women 23.4%, acute coronary syndrome 74.6%, and high bleeding risk 54.1%. The assigned monotherapy was continued at 1 year in 87.5% and 87.2% in the aspirin and clopidogrel groups, respectively. The incidence rates beyond 30 days and up to 1 year were similar between the aspirin and clopidogrel groups for both cardiovascular endpoint [4.5 and 4.5 per 100 person-year, hazard ratio 1.00 (95% confidence interval .77-1.30), P = .97], and bleeding endpoint [2.0 and 1.9, hazard ratio 1.02 (95% confidence interval .69-1.52), P = .92].

CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin monotherapy compared with clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with similar cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes beyond 1 month and up to 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (STOPDAPT-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04609111).


Clinical Comments

Cardiology

As the authors point out, this technically wasn't an ASA vs clopidogrel trial since the clopidogrel group had a month of prasugrel first, during a more vulnerable period...but still useful information.

Cardiology

Important data demonstrating that there is no apparent clinical difference between long-term monotherapy with either aspirin or clopidogrel in patients treated with PCI in this particular study. These data can impact clinical practice and will likely be used in meta-analyses.

Hemostasis and Thrombosis

Aspirin monotherapy following 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy is a treatment option after PCI with DES. Confirming information.

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register