McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Clinician Article

Autologous platelet-rich plasma for treating chronic wounds.



  • Martinez-Zapata MJ
  • Marti-Carvajal AJ
  • Sola I
  • Exposito JA
  • Bolibar I
  • Rodriguez L, et al.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 25;2016(5):CD006899. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006899.pub3. (Review)
PMID: 27223580
Read abstract Read evidence summary Read full text
Disciplines
  • Hematology
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • Surgery - Orthopaedics
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Surgery - Plastic
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Endocrine
    Relevance - 5/7
    Newsworthiness - 3/7
  • Surgery - Vascular
    Relevance - 4/7
    Newsworthiness - 4/7
  • Hospital Doctor/Hospitalists
    Relevance - 3/7
    Newsworthiness - 3/7
  • Internal Medicine
    Relevance - 3/7
    Newsworthiness - 3/7

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a treatment that contains fibrin and high concentrations of growth factors with the potential to improve the healing of chronic wounds. This is the first update of a review first published in 2012.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether autologous PRP promotes the healing of chronic wounds.

SEARCH METHODS: In June 2015, for this first update, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library): Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL. We also searched for ongoing and unpublished clinical trials in the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (searched January 2015). We did not impose any restrictions with respect to language, date of publication, or study setting.

SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared autologous PRP with placebo or alternative treatments for any type of chronic wound in adults. We did not apply any date or language restrictions.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodology, including two reviewers independently selecting studies for inclusion, extracting data, and assessing risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS: The search identified one new RCT, making a total of 10 included RCTs (442 participants, 42% women). The median number of participants per RCT was 29 (range 10 to 117). Four RCTs recruited people with a range of chronic wounds; three RCTs recruited people with venous leg ulcers, and three RCTs considered foot ulcers in people with diabetes. The median length of treatment was 12 weeks (range 8 to 40 weeks).It is unclear whether autologous PRP improves the healing of chronic wounds generally compared with standard treatment (with or without placebo) (risk ratio (RR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 1.50; I(2) = 27%, low quality evidence, 8 RCTs, 391 participants). Autologous PRP may increase the healing of foot ulcers in people with diabetes compared with standard care (with or without placebo) (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.49; I(2) = 0%, low quality evidence, 2 RCTs, 189 participants). It is unclear if autologous PRP affects the healing of venous leg ulcers (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.27; I(2) = 0% ). It is unclear if there is a difference in the risk of adverse events in people treated with PRP or standard care (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.29 to 3.88; I(2) = 0%, low quality evidence from 3 trials, 102 participants).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PRP may improve the healing of foot ulcers associated with diabetes, but this conclusion is based on low quality evidence from two small RCTs. It is unclear whether PRP influences the healing of other chronic wounds. The overall quality of evidence of autologous PRP for treating chronic wounds is low. There are very few RCTs evaluating PRP, they are underpowered to detect treatment effects, if they exist, and are generally at high or unclear risk of bias. Well designed and adequately powered clinical trials are needed.


Clinical Comments

Endocrine

I've not been aware of the use of PR for chronic wounds and after looking at the generally poor quality of the studies and the conclusions of the reviewers, I can understand why. They are very cautious not to say this is not useful--given the quality and small size of the studies. Clearly not ready for prime time. Given the plethora of diabetic foot ulcers and venous stasis ulcers if someone wants to do this study, it should be a piece of cake. Until then I'll struggle along with the other available modalities [albeit not great].

Surgery - Orthopaedics

The study looked at effect of PRP use in wound healing. It shows weak evidence supporting the use of PRP and this make the need for stronger evidence evident.

Surgery - Plastic

The role of PRP is still not clear in the management of chronic wounds.

Surgery - Vascular

The main finding is the lack of evidence for (or against) treatment of wounds with platelet-rich plasma: "There are very few RCTs evaluating PRP, they are underpowered to detect treatment effects, if they exist, and are generally at high or unclear risk of bias."

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register