Key messages from scientific research that's ready to be acted on
Got It, Hide thisOba Y, Sarva ST, Dias S Efficacy and safety of long-acting beta-agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist combinations in COPD: a network meta-analysis. Thorax. 2016;71:15-25.
In people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), does a combination of long-acting β-agonist (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) drugs reduce symptoms and improve quality of life?
COPD is a lung disease with inflammation. It reduces the flow of air through the lungs and is often associated with smoking. Symptoms of COPD include difficulty breathing, cough, wheezing, and chest tightness.
COPD can be treated, and several types of drugs can help control symptoms. Bronchodilator drugs, including LABAs and LAMAs, help relax muscles around the airways and make it easier to breath. Using a LABA and a LAMA together may control symptoms better than using either drug alone.
The researchers did a systematic review, searching for studies up to May 2015.
The found 23 randomized controlled trials with 27,172 people (average age 61 to 69 years, 52% to 96% men, 26% to 63% current smokers).
The key features of the trials were:
Trials were combined using a type of analysis (“network meta-analysis”) that lets you compare treatments even if they were not compared directly in the individual trials.
Compared with placebo, LABA/LAMA combination:
Compared with LABA alone, LABA/LAMA combination:
Compared with LAMA alone, LABA/LAMA combination:
In people with stable COPD, a LABA/LAMA combination improves quality of life and reduces breathlessness more than placebo, a LABA alone, or a LAMA alone. Treatments had similar rates of adverse events, including deaths.
Outcomes | Number of trials (people) | Effect of combination treatment* |
Quality of life at 6 months | 12 trials (18,536 people) | More people had improved quality of life than with placebo or LABA or LAMA alone |
Breathlessness at 6 months | 7 trials (9,045 people) | More people had improved breathlessness than with placebo or LABA or LAMA alone |
Moderate-to-severe exacerbations | 16 trials (18,224 people) | Fewer people had moderate or severe exacerbations than with placebo or LABA alone |
|
| No difference in effect between LABA/LAMA and LAMA alone |
Severe exacerbations | 19 trials (25,401 people) | No difference in effect between LABA/LAMA and placebo or LABA or LAMA alone |
Death | 15 trials (24,041 people) | No difference in effect between LABA/LAMA and placebo or LABA or LAMA alone |
Serious adverse events | 20 trials (27,172 people) | No difference in effect between LABA/LAMA and placebo or LABA or LAMA alone |