McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Clinician Article

Mortality outcomes in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.



  • Chai-Adisaksopha C
  • Hillis C
  • Isayama T
  • Lim W
  • Iorio A
  • Crowther M
J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Nov;13(11):2012-20. doi: 10.1111/jth.13139. Epub 2015 Oct 5. (Review)
PMID: 26356595
Read abstract Read evidence summary Read full text
Disciplines
  • Family Medicine (FM)/General Practice (GP)
    Relevance - 7/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)
    Relevance - 7/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • Hemostasis and Thrombosis
    Relevance - 7/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Cardiology
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Hematology
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Internal Medicine
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Neurology
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used as an alternative for warfarin. However, the impact of DOACs on mortality outcomes compared with warfarin remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the mortality outcomes in patients treated with DOACs vs. warfarin (or another vitamin K antagonist).

METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases (inception to September 2014), conference abstracts and www.clinicaltrials.gov, were searched, without language restriction. Studies were selected if there were phase III, randomized trials comparing DOACs with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism.

RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 102 707 adult patients were included in the analysis. The case-fatality rate of major bleeding was 7.57% (95% CI, 6.53-8.68; I(2) = 0%) in patients taking DOACs and 11.04% (95% CI, 9.16-13.07; I(2) = 33.3%) in patients taking warfarin. The rate of fatal bleeding in adult patients receiving DOACs was 0.16 per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 0.12-0.20; I(2) = 36.5%). When compared with warfarin, DOACs were associated with significant reductions in fatal bleeding (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43-0.64; I(2) = 0%), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.94; I(2) = 0%) and all-cause mortality (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96; I(2) = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS: The use of DOACs compared with warfarin is associated with a lower rate of fatal bleeding, case-fatality rate of major bleeding, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality.


Clinical Comments

General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)

Fairly robust meta-analysis of trial data, providing some reassurance to clinicians that the heavily marketed DOAC's have an adequate safety profile in these carefully selected trial patients. Observational studies with more diverse populations will be helpful in filling in the gaps in our knowledge. Our comfort level with these medications is rising somewhat.

Hemostasis and Thrombosis

Re-Cover 2 demonstrated that DOACS might be inferior to warfarin. What about LMWH (monitored with ultra-specific thrombin generation tests) instead of DOACS?

Neurology

Although not new, this is useful information. It reinforces the evidence for reduction in fatal bleeds and cardiovasc mortality with DOACs compared to warfarin. It's mainly relevant to neurologists dealing with stroke.

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register