+AA
Fr
Back
Clinician Article

Efficacy of face mask in preventing respiratory virus transmission: A systematic review and meta-analysis.



  • Liang M
  • Gao L
  • Cheng C
  • Zhou Q
  • Uy JP
  • Heiner K, et al.
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 May 27:101751. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101751. (Review)
PMID: 32473312
Read abstract Read full text
Disciplines
  • Occupational and Environmental Health
    Relevance - 7/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • Family Medicine (FM)/General Practice (GP)
    Relevance - 7/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)
    Relevance - 7/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Hospital Doctor/Hospitalists
    Relevance - 7/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Internal Medicine
    Relevance - 7/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Respirology/Pulmonology
    Relevance - 7/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Public Health
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • Infectious Disease
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 4/7
  • Intensivist/Critical Care
    Relevance - 5/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conflicting recommendations exist related to whether masks have a protective effect on the spread of respiratory viruses.

METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement was consulted to report this systematic review. Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP (Chinese) database.

RESULTS: A total of 21 studies met our inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses suggest that mask use provided a significant protective effect (OR = 0.35 and 95% CI = 0.24-0.51). Use of masks by healthcare workers (HCWs) and non-healthcare workers (Non-HCWs) can reduce the risk of respiratory virus infection by 80% (OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.11-0.37) and 47% (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.36-0.79). The protective effect of wearing masks in Asia (OR = 0.31) appeared to be higher than that of Western countries (OR = 0.45). Masks had a protective effect against influenza viruses (OR = 0.55), SARS (OR = 0.26), and SARS-CoV-2 (OR = 0.04). In the subgroups based on different study designs, protective effects of wearing mask were significant in cluster randomized trials and observational studies.

CONCLUSIONS: This study adds additional evidence of the enhanced protective value of masks, we stress that the use masks serve as an adjunctive method regarding the COVID-19 outbreak.


Clinical Comments

Family Medicine (FM)/General Practice (GP)

A well-conducted meta-analysis documenting that wearing masks decreases the spread of respiratory viruses. If there are some who are following science and still question the utility of masks, then this meta-analysis has a purpose.

Intensivist/Critical Care

The significant level of heterogeneity of treatment effects that persists despite sub-group analysis is concerning. However this analysis strengthens the recommendation of universal mask use particularly in the setting of viral infections.

Public Health

This is a bad quality systematic review. It seems more like an ad for masks.

Respirology/Pulmonology

With the current state of affairs with COVID-19 infection, this is important research showing mask use in preventing the spread of respiratory viral infections. The funnel plot is clear in terms of mask use. This study is not specific to COVID-19, but does indicate general positive data regarding mask use.

Respirology/Pulmonology

Given the politicization of wearing masks, this evidence is vitally important to disseminate broadly and quickly, so that those who wish to be guided by science can respond accordingly.

Respirology/Pulmonology

This is a well-done meta-analysis that could very well inform policies on the use of masking in public, healthcare facilities, and in the home. This reviewer was impressed with the finding that surgical masks seem to provide more protection to the wearer than many have thought; that strategies to provide and improve masking in the homes of infected individuals is an untouched area that might be exploited to reduce infections even more.

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register
Want the latest in aging research? Sign up for our email alerts.
Subscribe

Support for the Portal is largely provided by the Labarge Optimal Aging Initiative. AGE-WELL is a contributing partner. Help us to continue to provide direct and easy access to evidence-based information on health and social conditions to help you stay healthy, active and engaged as you grow older. Donate Today.

© 2012 - 2020 McMaster University | 1280 Main Street West | Hamilton, Ontario L8S4L8 | +1 905-525-9140 | Terms Of Use